
Sanchez had a pre-existi
ng beef with Jon since Sanchez, one of the only national Latino mainstream T.V. newscaster
s, felt he was gratuitous
ly and repeatedly being made to look like a fool by Jon. Sanchez' point was that Jon's privileged
, both as a White person and member of an elite ethnic group that doesn't have the same empirical basis for worrying about the negative career implicatio
ns of being satirized like Latinos do. Given their lack of privilege and power in society and in determinin
g how their image is represente
d in the media, that means Latinos are far more vulnerable and have less resources to combat the negative consequenc
es of looking foolish, thereby confirming the negative stereotype
s "justifyin
g" their media under-repr
esentation
.
Jon didn't take into account he possesses power to spread/con
firm negative stereotype
s of Latinos "justifyin
g" their under-repr
esentation - a symptom of "white privilege,
" "colorblin
d racism," or "nonconsci
ous bias" - the false assumption that "everyone'
s equal" and the effects on them of any action are equal. Not true when their racial/eth
nic groups are hierarchic
ally stratified regarding relative power in society. Had Sanchez did the same to Jon, it would have no effect since they're not under-repr
esented in media or important institutio
ns like Latinos/Bl
acks. That's why Sanchez called Jon (whom I love) a "bigot." Though social-psy
chology 101, most White progressiv
es seem colorBLIND to this.
About CNNRead the Article at HuffingtonPost
No comments:
Post a Comment